U.S. Homeland as a Battleground? Goodbye Civil Rights…

Posted: December 11th, 2011 | Author: Peter | Filed under: oppression, politics, video, war | No Comments »

Shocking that this comes from Fox Business News, but it’s incredibly important to be aware of how our Civil Rights are being infringed on…

And Keith Olbermann weighs in…


Did the End Justify the Means?

Posted: August 28th, 2011 | Author: Peter | Filed under: kingdom, war | No Comments »

As a liberal, I’m really struggling with the policies of our current administration.  Even though our most recent incursion into Libya has so-far proved far more successful than Iraq and Afghanistan, that’s one of the horrible realities of war: we can only measure success or lack thereof in retrospect.  And we can only assess the damage after it’s too late.

I can’t, in all honesty, call myself a pacifist.  But I can’t think of a circumstance in which we would know enough to go into a situation to be justified in waging war: having counted the cost, knowing the potential outcomes, and in due diligence, acting with some sort of “just war” moral certitude.  We tend to look at World War II as the example of a “just war,” and there’s nothing I can offer, because only perspective from the context of the day really illuminates the question – not objective moralizing about the nature of the war from decades and decades later.  But that’s the point… no matter how much evil we see in retrospect, it was not quite so apparent then.  Is that knowledge reason to jump into every incursion we see?  As potential Third Reichs?

No, there really has to be something to active, aggressive, intentional pacifism.  It is not neutrality.  It is taking a side, but it is a different kind of fighting, and a different way of dying.


Facebook Fundamentalism Revisited: Adam said…

Posted: January 22nd, 2011 | Author: Peter | Filed under: church, culture, emergence, fundamentalism, future, make the world better, reparations, respectful dialogue, sin, suffering, truth, war | No Comments »
I just wanted to repost a great little comment from my friend Adam because it so succinctly speaks to the underlying problem with Christians who refuse to acknowledge our own corporate/historical sins:

*      *      *

Wow, I’m a little late to the party on this. I know your whole point is that it’s a stupid game to play (and I’m with you), but claiming that Muslims are more violent due to body count is just dumb. If he’s saying 10,000 deaths, then he’s counting bombings in Iraq and Afghanistan which really boil down to internal power struggles by people who identify as Muslim.

Apply that same criteria to Christians and it doesn’t look so good. You don’t have to go back to the crusades. Heck, some of the worst massacres in recent history have been perpetrated by people that identify as Christian; the Rwandan genocide easily taking the cake.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Rwanda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_Genocide
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_Genocide

Oh well. I’m beating a dead horse, preaching to the choir, and mixing metaphors all at the same time. I think I’m just tired of sentiments that demonize others. That and too many mosques have been torched in my town.

*      *      *

The horse isn’t dead as long as these conversations keep coming up, Adam.  We need these reminders.  Sadly, the very conversation I was having is indicative of the very problem inherent in extremist religion.  Angry Christians, demonizing Islam for extremism, were refusing to acknowledge the sins and shortcomings of their own religion.  If we can’t even get past THAT very initial step in interfaith dialogue (that’s like Step 2, after, “Hi, my name is Pete…”) then we’re pretty much doomed.


I grabbed some text from the links you provided.  On the Rwandan Genocide:Though religious factors were not prominent (the event was ethnically motivated), the Human Rights Watch reported that a number of religious authorities in Rwanda, particularly Roman Catholic, failed to condemn the genocide at the time. Some in its religious hierarchy have been brought to trial for their participation by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and convicted. Bishop Misago was accused of corruption and complicity in the genocide, but he was cleared of all charges in 2000. The majority of Rwandans, and Tutsis in particular, are Catholic, so shared religion did not prevent genocide.”


On Religion in Rwanda: The Rwandan government reported on November 1, 2006, that 56.5% of the Rwanda’s population is Roman Catholic, 26% is Protestant, 11.1% is Seventh-day Adventist, 4.6% is Muslim, 1.7% claims no religious affiliation, and 0.1% practices traditional indigenous beliefs.” 


So while religious factors may not have been “prominent” in that event, the events and atrocities were committed by a population over 90% Christian.


On the Bosnian Genocide: In 2001, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) judged that the 1995 Srebrenica massacre was genocide. In the unanimous ruling “Prosecutor v. Krstic”, the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), located in The Hague, reaffirmed that the Srebrenica massacre was genocide, the Presiding Judge Theodor Meron stating:





By seeking to eliminate a part of the Bosnian Muslims, the Bosnian Serb forces committed genocide. They targeted for extinction the forty thousand Bosnian Muslims living in Srebrenica, a group which was emblematic of the Bosnian Muslims in general. They stripped all the male Muslim prisoners, military and civilian, elderly and young, of their personal belongings and identification, and deliberately and methodically killed them solely on the basis of their identity.

The Serbian population is predominantly Orthodox Christian.  Unless we’re still unwilling to accept that someone from “our own tribe” is capable of evil.




Adam, thanks for these tragic, poignant and illustrative reminders that Christians can and do commit atrocities, even in modern times, and that religion is never a deciding factor as to the potential for evil a human being or society carries.  We need to keep these conversations moving forward, and the only way forward is for us to own our own sins.  Modeling this, I pray we can invite our neighbors to feel safe enough to do the same.


Iraq War: What Cost of Life is Justifiable?

Posted: August 19th, 2010 | Author: Peter | Filed under: politics, suffering, war | 4 Comments »

I have a friend who continues to maintain that the Iraq War was one of George W. Bush’s few “genius” maneuvers.  And he’s not being tongue-in-cheek.  He sees the endeavor as a success, and with Wednesday’s news of “Final US Combat Troops Withdrawing” he’d proudly affirm: “mission accomplished.”

My retort now is the same as it was 5 years ago when we first started arguing: how many lives make that “success” worthwhile?  Is it a fair trade?

Here are some statistics from a source (http://antiwar.com/casualties) you may find dubious, but they document their sources, which appear credible:


American Military Casualties in Iraq 
Date
Total
In Combat
American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 4415 3493
Since “Mission Accomplished” (5/1/03) (the list)


4276


3385
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3954 3187
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3556 2860
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): 187 88

Iraqi Casualties
Iraq Deaths Estimator 

 Is American military “mission accomplished” worth the cost?

I would argue without hesitation: absolutely not.