George Fox Seminary: A Gushing Plug...

Over the last few days I've been discussing George Fox Evangelical Seminary with a blog reader who is interested in attending. I won't sacrifice his privacy by reprinting his e-mails, but I'm such an enthusiastic supporter of GFS that I thought I would share some of my e-mail comments about the school. Combined below...

* * *
Thanks for e-mailing me!

This morning, I was thinking about my seminary experience so far and how thankful I am for the atmosphere and community there. It was serendipitous to find your e-mail just then. In many ways, GFS has restored my hope in the church.

Of course, I never stopped believing in the power (and victory) of the Body of Christ, but the last seven or eight years have led me to wonder if the Body of Christ is truly being invited into our churches (or are we whitewashed tombs full of Evangelical bones?).

I'm still somewhat disillusioned - and wrestling past bitterness therein - but to my joy, GFS has been a safe place to do just that. To heal and grow at the same time. And I've been blessed to find fellowship with Christians of incredible depth, maturity, and understanding - both professors and classmates.

I've taken classes with Southern Baptists and Episcopals, though the majority of students I've encountered are Quaker, Presbyterian or Foursquare (an interesting mix among those, alone).

GFS is also a very open environment for emerging church conversations. Though there isn't an official position to my knowledge, GFS faculty and administration express a lot of ongoing excitement about current developments with Emergent and other postmodern Christian communities, thinktanks and movements. Leonard Sweet, Brian McLaren, Todd Hunter, Dan Kimball and Jim Henderson all have active relationships with the school, its mission, and in most of their cases, teach classes there on occasion. The only other school I am aware of with the same level of future-orientation is Mars Hill Graduate School in Seattle (no relation to Mars Hill Church in Seattle). For purely academic focus, I would imagine Fuller Theological Seminary in and Princeton Theological Seminary are more rigorous. But I have nothing but praise and satisfaction with GFS at this point.

I visited another Portland seminary as well, before choosing GFS. The dean there told me that my Emerging Church questions were interesting, but wouldn't be "appropriate" to discuss in the classroom: "Many of our students just wouldn't be comfortable with that." He added that I would be welcome to talk about those things in private, one-on-one with professors.

The discomfort and lack of familiarity with some of the big questions of our day (in my opinion) told me that the school wasn't right for me. Since I'd heard the other (third) seminary in Portland was even more conservative, I didn't bother visiting.

I also want to emphasize that George Fox is still a very "spiritual" atmosphere, in spite of it's more moderate, progressive (some would say "liberal," but I don't think that label is quite fair) leanings.

I grew up in Pentecostal and "Jesus People" non-denom atmosphere. I don't really practice "purist Pentecostalism" at this time, but I do believe strongly in the power of the Holy Spirit.

I'll put it this way: I believe in supernatural gifts, in tongues, prophesy, healing, etc... but I also believe in the sometimes-scary power of emotions and groupthink mentalities.

I worry that a lot of what we see in today's modern churches is just a religious brand of concert-goer enthusiasm. At secular concerts, I watch the audiences close their hands, sing along, sway back and forth, jump up and down, and sometimes quietly meditate on the music... looks shockingly like my old Sunday night worship service.

So maybe I'm just a little cynical.

I also respect your caution about Emergent. You're right to be cautious about anything spiritual, for that matter. But I appreciate that you're "hesitant" without being adversarial - we've got enough of that mentality in the church already. Good for you for exploring and weighing things carefully! I may not call myself overtly "Emergent" [largely because I hate the limitations of titles] but I am emerging, enjoy Emergent, and appreciate being part of that broader discussion about where the church is going and what that will mean at spiritual, corporate and theological levels.

Thanks for asking Dxxxxxxxx, blessings on your journey,
Peter Walker

read more about my thoughts on Christianity in the real world at


James North said...

Doesn't it rain 11 months a year in Portland? It is 80 degrees at the end of October at a glorious place called Fuller. Miss you lots pete.

nearemmaus said...

I come from a similar back ground as the writer of this letter and I think the "third" "more conservative" seminary is where I attend. I have never had my questions rejected. I've never been made to feel uncomfortable asking questions that didn't line up with the faculty confession. I've been more than welcome to disagree with my professors, explore issues related to the emerging church and various philosophical and theological issues, and all the while I have been welcomed by the faculty as a fellow Christian. While I am glad to hear GFES is this way (one of my good friends is a student there) I would emphasize that the caricature of the "other" school should be taken with a grain of salt.

Peter J Walker said...

Thanks Nearemmaus. Didn't want to caricature the other school (well, not too harshly) but the cautionary word from the dean is pretty close to verbatim. I'm glad to hear you've had a good experience! Thanks for dropping by, I've had other acquaintances with generally good experiences there, as well.

Popular Posts